<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/</link>
	<description>News, Updates, Questions and Answers about NetEqualizer Bandwidth Shaping Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetEqualizer News: June 2011 &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NetEqualizer News: June 2011 &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-2545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] NetEqualizer 5.0 and the P2P locator technology are available at no charge for customers with current NetEqualizer Software Subscriptions (NSS). Additional information about the NetEqualizer and user privacy can be found in the NetEqualizer News Blog&#8217;s &#8220;NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NetEqualizer 5.0 and the P2P locator technology are available at no charge for customers with current NetEqualizer Software Subscriptions (NSS). Additional information about the NetEqualizer and user privacy can be found in the NetEqualizer News Blog&#8217;s &#8220;NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equalizing Compared to Application Shaping (Traditional Layer-7 &#8220;Deep Packet Inspection&#8221; Products) &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Equalizing Compared to Application Shaping (Traditional Layer-7 &#8220;Deep Packet Inspection&#8221; Products) &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-1100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] finally lest we forget, application shaping is considered by some to be a violation of Net Neutrality, due to the very nature of packet [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] finally lest we forget, application shaping is considered by some to be a violation of Net Neutrality, due to the very nature of packet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Congress Won&#8217;t End All Conflicts Between Users and Providers &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Congress Won&#8217;t End All Conflicts Between Users and Providers &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] form of management is typically nececsary for a network to run at its full potential. The key is finding some middle ground.   Posted in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] form of management is typically nececsary for a network to run at its full potential. The key is finding some middle ground.   Posted in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Questions Popular Bandwidth Shaping Myth &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Questions Popular Bandwidth Shaping Myth &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more on how the NetEqualizer fits into the ongoing debate, see our past article, NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise.   Posted in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more on how the NetEqualizer fits into the ongoing debate, see our past article, NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise.   Posted in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Questions Popular Bandwidth Shaping Myth &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Questions Popular Bandwidth Shaping Myth &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more on how the NetEqualizer fits into the ongoing debate, see our past article, NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Some SEO mythsReading Reflection Questions Jan. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more on how the NetEqualizer fits into the ongoing debate, see our past article, NetEqualizer Offers Net Neutrality, User Privacy Compromise. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Some SEO mythsReading Reflection Questions Jan. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do We Need an Internet User Bill of Rights? &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do We Need an Internet User Bill of Rights? &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] proponent of both transparency and the protection of user privacy, having devoted several years to developing technology that maintains network quality while respecting the privacy of Internet users.  Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)How to contract consultant developersFor [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proponent of both transparency and the protection of user privacy, having devoted several years to developing technology that maintains network quality while respecting the privacy of Internet users.  Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)How to contract consultant developersFor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Revival of Net Neutrality Revisits An Issue Hardly Forgot &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s Revival of Net Neutrality Revisits An Issue Hardly Forgot &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the minds of ISPs, administrators, and many users. Over the past few years, we at NetEqualizer have been working to provide a compromise for these interested parties, ensuring network quality and neutrality while protecting the privacy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the minds of ISPs, administrators, and many users. Over the past few years, we at NetEqualizer have been working to provide a compromise for these interested parties, ensuring network quality and neutrality while protecting the privacy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Revival of Net Neutrality Broaches An Issue Hardly Forgotten &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s Revival of Net Neutrality Broaches An Issue Hardly Forgotten &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the minds of ISPs, administrators, and many users. Over the past few years, we at NetEqualizer have been working to provide a compromise for these users, ensuring network quality and neutrality while protecting the privacy of users. It [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the minds of ISPs, administrators, and many users. Over the past few years, we at NetEqualizer have been working to provide a compromise for these users, ensuring network quality and neutrality while protecting the privacy of users. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetEqualizer White Paper Comparison with Traditional Layer-7 (Deep Packet Inspection Products) &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NetEqualizer White Paper Comparison with Traditional Layer-7 (Deep Packet Inspection Products) &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] And finally lest we not forget that application shaping is considered by some to be a a violation of Net Neutrality. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And finally lest we not forget that application shaping is considered by some to be a a violation of Net Neutrality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bittorrent and peer to peer (p2p) usage waning ? &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog</title>
		<link>http://netequalizernews.com/2008/08/12/netequalizer-offers-net-neutrality-user-privacy-compromise/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bittorrent and peer to peer (p2p) usage waning ? &#171; NetEqualizer News Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netequalizer.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week,  so I don&#8217;t think it is a fluke. It is kind of ironic, with all the controversy around Net Neutrality and Bit-torrent blocking  that the problem seems to be taking care of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week,  so I don&#8217;t think it is a fluke. It is kind of ironic, with all the controversy around Net Neutrality and Bit-torrent blocking  that the problem seems to be taking care of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

