The quote by the Adams State administrator sums it up.
"The price is fair, the best value in the product space"
This is a re-post of the Adams state blog, the details are a bit technical which don’t reflect the actual simplicity of a basic setup. From box to Network it is usually under an hour, without little or no recurring maintenance.
Also note NTOP reporting issues were remedied shortly after this original post back in 2006.
In May 2006 we switched bandwidth management products. We moved from traditional layer 7 traffic shaping to bandwidth arbitration. We looked at upgrading our current product and 3 other solutions.
I am convinced protocol and layer 7 based filtering is dead. I expect P2P products to use SSL or TLS bypassing layer 7 filters. Ethically layer 7 filtering smells like content filtering, big brother, evil.
Bandwidth arbitration keeps things simple. When the Internet connection reaches a tuneable level of utilization the arbitrator slows down longer lived higher usage data transfers based on the number of connections and their utilization. Per host connection limiting keeps P2P playing nicely.
The chosen product? Net Equalizer.
Based on the open source Bandwidth Arbitrator, it is easy to configure and highly customizable. Support has been excellent.
- Initial Tests
With the netequalizer link size at ~20% below our average utilization our pipe remained completely usable. Interactive applications responded well while large transfers continued to function. The connection limits appear to keep bittorrent and gnutella functional and in control.
- Qualitative Results 2006-06-23
Downloads are faster, latency is at pre layer 7 filtering levels (9ms vs 300ms), P2P protocols are usable again, and we no longer police content, we manage bandwidth. Support has been excellent with technicians responding directly to my emails with all technical levels of questions answered, good, silly, and questions about the inner workings of the appliance. I was instructed on cautions to take withe any attempt at customization, and given the go ahead for some minor custom configuration without voiding the warranty.
- Update 2006-11-06
We have run the Netequalizer for 6 months. Results are phenomenal compared with our last product. Our Netequalizer box has been up for 116 days with no configuration changes from the start of the semester. I look at my Cacti graphs and the custom CGI reports for solace, as if I’m disappointed the appliance doesn’t need more care and feeding.
- Our Configuration
For our 21Mb link, we set 3 basic parameters:
RATIO 75 BRAIN_SIZE 2500 CONNECTION LIMIT 40
The ratio is the amount of of our pipe in use before any shaping (arbitration) takes place. The brain_size is the number of connections for the equalizer to track and act upon, I have seen this number reached only once on our system. The connection limit means we allow 20 incoming and 20 outgoing connections maximum for every host on our network. We had to set every one or our servers as an exception to this rule, allowing 50,000 incoming and outgoing connections for those. We also had to specify our link size. That’s it end of configuration.
- Custom Modifications
We did very simple things to appease ourselves of the performance of the box. First, we placed an SNMP daemon on it. I used a stock snmpd from a Mandriva 2006 server, from net-snmp 22.214.171.124. I was going to static compile one, but it turned out the dynamic libraries were all in place, here is the ldd output:
ldd /usr/local/snmp/sbin/snmpd linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x4001b000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4001f000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x40031000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x40057000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
I put the daemon in /usr/local/snmp/sbin/ and the mibs and snmpd.conf in /usr/local/snmp/share/snmp/.
We created 2 custom CGI scripts. One script shows the complete current logfile on demand rather than the last however many lines the web interface shows. The other script shows total current connections, followed by a list of hosts with more than 3 connections, sorted by total outgoing and incoming connections. I modified some of the scripts provided in the /art directory to produce those results. Someone with more familiarity with the Linux bridge utilities could probably do better.
Here is the showlog.cgi script I placed in the /var/www/cgi-bin/arbi directory:
#!/bin/perl print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print "<html><head></head><body><pre>"; system("cat /tmp/arblog.bak"); system("cat /tmp/arblog"); print "</pre></body></html>";
Here are some lines from the showlog output, catching the arbitrator slowing someone down with .05 second delays (the DELAY portion):
11/06/06 08:39:32 PENALTY IP : 126.96.36.199 188.8.131.52 POOL: 0 WAVG: 133212 BUFF: 102 DELAY: 5 11/06/06 08:39:32 INCREASE PENALTY IP: 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11 POOL: 0 BUFF: 102 DELAY: 10 11/06/06 08:39:44 Traffic up: 575430 Traffic down: 962330 POOL 0 PENALTY THRESHOLD pool 0 up 2688000 down 2688000 11/06/06 08:39:47 PENALTY DECREASE: 18.104.22.168 22.214.171.124 to 5 POOL: 0 11/06/06 08:39:51 PENALTY REMOVE: 126.96.36.199 188.8.131.52 POOL: 0
Here is some output from our connections script with the top 5 out and in hosts:
Total Connections: 2074 More than 3 Outgoing Connections: 184.108.40.206 76 220.127.116.11 61 18.104.22.168 58 22.214.171.124 36 126.96.36.199 21 More than 3 Incoming Connections: 188.8.131.52 88 184.108.40.206 76 220.127.116.11 57 18.104.22.168 56 22.214.171.124 51
Notice the hosts with more than 20 connections. Some of these are exempt servers, but others are workstations. Our firewall disallows non related incoming connections campus workstations, Netequalizer is in front of the firewall. I have examined some of these cases and many are P2P connection attempts that never truly connect to transfer data or are very short lived. We typically see about 20 to 30 hosts at or above the connection limit and about 100 hosts with more than 3 incmoing or outgoing connections, including all of our Internet servers.
- Verification, Tests
We have an out of band PC using Ntop to track what hosts on the network are doing. I have verified the output of the Netequalizer against our Ntop machine many times in the last few months. I have also on occasion initiated a large download from a fast Internet site when I notice one or two folks getting high data rates. At those times I have observed Netequalizer start to arbitrate, creating head room on the pipe to keep bursty interactive traffic responsive.
- Criticism, Pros, Cons
The user interface is spartan, strictly functional Ntop is not really usable on the appliance Editors note: ( NTOP has been updated and supported in later versions since this comment was posted) An SNMP daemon should be included More logging should be available Performance is as advertised, if not better Minimal configuration is required Maintenance is minimal User manual has some typos User manual requires a full read User manual is only 36 pages, reflects minimal configuration required Some level of customization is allowed without voiding the warranty Support is excellent The price is fair, the best value in the product space
Created by APconnections, the NetEqualizer is a plug-and-play bandwidth control and WAN/Internet optimization appliance that is flexible and scalable. When the network is congested, NetEqualizer’s unique “behavior shaping” technology dynamically and automatically gives priority to latency sensitive applications, such as VoIP and email. Click here for a full price list.